What it is
A closed-corpus thesis engine: it operates entirely on materials you supply (PDF articles, books, lecture slides, survey exports, interview transcripts, spreadsheets). It organizes, interprets, tests, and writes, turning your raw stack into a defensible, KEDGE-compliant thesis.
What it is not
-
It does not search the web or add outside sources.
-
It does not fabricate citations or data.
-
It does not submit work on your behalf or promise to “evade detection.”
-
It is a drafting and analysis assistant; you remain the author.
Inputs it accepts
-
Literature: PDFs (peer-reviewed articles, white papers, reports), slide decks.
-
Data: CSV/XLSX from surveys (e.g., Google Forms/Qualtrics), experiment logs, coding sheets, interview transcripts.
-
Constraints: school guide (formatting, structure, word count), rubric, required theories, required sections.
-
Style seeds: 1–3 pages of your writing to match tone (used as suggestions; you approve/overwrite).
Core capabilities
1) Corpus ingestion & organization
-
Extracts metadata (title, authors, year, venue, DOI/URL) and builds a study matrix (methods, sample, key findings, limitations, tags).
-
Deduplicates and clusters papers by theme, method, theory, and your custom tags (e.g., Ownable/Personalised/Immersive; trust; friction).
-
Links each claim to its evidence trail (paper → page → passage), so every paragraph has sources.
2) Literature synthesis (thesis–antithesis–synthesis)
-
For each theme, generates:
-
Thesis (mainstream or supportive view).
-
Antithesis (conflicting, critical, or boundary conditions).
-
Synthesis (what survives after reconciling evidence, with scope/limits).
-
-
Produces “so-what” bullets that directly inform your hypotheses and managerial implications.
3) Hypotheses & theoretical scaffolding
-
Maps your corpus to appropriate lenses (e.g., TAM/UTAUT2, privacy calculus, Uses & Gratifications, flow, social/telepresence).
-
Proposes directional hypotheses grounded in the literature clusters, each traceable to sources and measurable with the data you supplied.
-
Builds a conceptual pathway (constructs → mechanisms → outcomes) and an RQ–theory–metric map showing exactly how each hypothesis will be tested.
4) Method planning from your data (no new collection)
-
Reads your survey instrument and outputs:
-
Variable dictionary, scale reliability checks (α/ω), index construction rules.
-
If you used Best–Worst Scaling/MaxDiff: task balance checks, part-worth estimation plan (MNL/HB), and segment definitions.
-
-
Generates analysis scripts (R/Python, optional) for full reproducibility and a bulletproof Appendix.
5) Analysis & results writing (from your files)
-
Runs the planned analyses only on your data: descriptives, correlations, regressions/ANOVA/SEM, or BWS part-worths and confidence intervals.
-
Auto-creates tables/figures (publication-style), captions, and neutral, non-overclaimy narrative text.
-
Adds a robustness subsection (alternative specs, sensitivity checks) where feasible.
6) Full-thesis drafting (school-specific)
-
Outputs a complete draft following your programme’s structure (e.g., KEDGE: Intro → Research Question → Literature Review → Hypotheses → Model → Methodology → Results → Discussion → Contributions → Managerial Implications → Limitations → Future Research → References → Appendix).
-
Inserts traceable in-text citations (Author–Year) and builds an APA 7 reference list from your PDFs—no phantom citations.
-
Provides chapter roadmaps, signposting, and bridging paragraphs so the story flows.
7) Managerial implications & playbook
-
Converts findings into design principles, risk/trust mitigation, pricing/packaging levers, and a phased implementation roadmap (MVP → scale).
-
Includes a managerial checklist and a measurement plan (leading indicators, retention cohorts, advocacy proxies).
8) Voice alignment & transparency
-
Suggests phrasing in your style (from your samples), but keeps change-tracking on: every AI-assisted sentence is reviewable.
-
Flags any paragraph with thin evidence or over-extrapolation for you to revise.
9) Integrity & compliance rails
-
No external retrieval: everything is drawn from your uploaded corpus.
-
Citation integrity: every cite is grounded in a specific PDF and page span.
-
Originality support: paraphrase suggestions and quote extraction with page refs; you decide what to keep.
-
Privacy & IP: local/secure processing; allows you to purge data and generated text.
Workflow (how you’d actually use it)
-
Load inputs: PDFs, datasets, rubric/guide, style samples.
-
Auto-organize: study matrix + tags + dedupe; you skim the dashboard and approve clusters.
-
Lit synthesis: per theme, read thesis–antithesis–synthesis, approve/edit, and mark key cites.
-
Hypotheses & model: review the proposed RQs/hypotheses and conceptual figure; accept or tweak.
-
Method lock-in: confirm variables, indices, and analysis plan derived from your actual data.
-
Run analysis: execute scripts; inspect QA flags (e.g., missing data, outliers, attention checks).
-
Draft chapters: generate sections with citations, tables/figures, and bridging text.
-
Polish: refine tone, tighten claims, finalize implications; export Word/LaTeX + slide deck.
-
Archive: save the evidence trail (study matrix, scripts, outputs) for viva defense and appendices.
Deliverables
-
Annotated outline (chapter by chapter with key sources and “so-what” bullets).
-
Full thesis draft (with tracked changes).
-
Figures & tables (editable) + captions.
-
APA 7 reference list (verified against your PDFs).
-
Appendices: study matrix, PRISMA-lite log (if you tracked screening), analysis scripts, robustness notes.
-
Defense pack: 15–20-minute slide deck with speaker notes and likely examiner questions.
Customization (example: your Web3 in sport thesis)
-
Built-in tags for Ownable (blockchain/NFT/ticketing), Personalised (AI), Immersive (AR/VR).
-
Templates for benefit taxonomy, BWS attributes, and a community-health pathway (identification, participation, retention, advocacy).
-
Case-sheet generator (Sorare, NBA App personalisation, NFL ALL DAY/Ticketmaster, AR/VR broadcasts) using only the PDFs you provided.
Quality controls
-
Evidence density meter: warns if a section leans too much on one source or non-peer-reviewed items.
-
Balance & fairness: prompts for counter-evidence to avoid one-sided arguments (antithesis coverage).
-
Claim → Data hooks: every empirical claim links to a specific statistic in your dataset or a quoted passage in a PDF.
-
Readability & cohesion: checks transitions, paragraph aims, and redundancy; suggests cuts to meet word limits.
Export & interoperability
-
Word (.docx) with auto-generated ToC, Lists, headers/footers meeting school formatting.
-
LaTeX template with biblatex for APA.
-
Citations: BibTeX/CSL JSON for reference managers.
-
Data & code: zipped folder with CSVs, scripts, and rendered outputs for reproducibility.






Reviews
There are no reviews yet.